Robert William Kimble, Sr. v. William H. Rehnquist, Chief Justice, United States Supreme Court

77 F.3d 489 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert William KIMBLE, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William H. REHNQUIST, Chief Justice, United States Supreme Court, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-55592. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 7, 1996. * Decided Feb. 12, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert William Kimble, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for lack of prosecution of his action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) brought against William H. Rehnquist, Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We may affirm the district court on any basis supported by the record. Shaw v. California Dep't of Alcoholic Beverage Control, 788 F.2d 600 , 603 (9th Cir.1986). 4 It is well-settled that judges are…