Parra v. UAL Corp.

77 F.3d 489 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Henry PARRA; Kay Parra; Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UAL CORPORATION; United Airlines; Stephen Wolfe; Mark Collins; Bob Graves; Tom Sims; Ken Gibson; Joe Talaugon; Edward Heinrich; Larry Coleman; Does 1 to 100, Individually and Inclusive, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15967. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 17, 1995. * Decided Feb. 20, 1996. 1 Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and BAIRD, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 The Parras appeal pro se from the district court's entry of summary judgment in favor of the appellees, arguing that the court erred by holding that their state law claims were preempted by the Railway Labor Act ("RLA"), 45 U.S.C. §§ 151-63 , 181-88. We affirm. 4 The RLA precludes Mr. Parra's claims because they involve minor disputes arising out of or related to his employment disciplinary proceeding and are inextricably intertwined…