Laufman v. Mayer

77 F.3d 489 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lourene M. LAUFMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William MAYER; River Park Care Center; County of Sacramento; Board of Regents of University of California; Sutter Oaks Alzheimer Center, et al. Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55492. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 7, 1996. * Decided Feb. 13, 1996. Before: POOLE, WIGGINS and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lourene M. Laufman appeals pro se the district court's February 3, 1994 order denying her petition for an order to show cause why the defendants should not be held in contempt for failure to comply with the permanent injunction issued October 20, 1983, in Doe v. Gallinot, No. CV 76-0107-RMT (C.D.Cal.1983) ("Gallinot injunction"). Laufman also appeals the district court's March 8, 1994 order denying her timely motion to vacate the district court's order of February 3rd. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We…