Matter of Shrewsbury

Good Law
77 F.3d 490·1996 WL 64988·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 8905
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 12, 199694-16736California568 words

Opinion

Opinion

77 F.3d 490 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In the Matter of Connie Hoang SHREWSBURY. Connie Hoang SHREWSBURY, aka Mai Thi Dao; aka Be Thi Dao; aka Be Thi Shrewsbury, Petitioner-Appellant, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-16736. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 12, 1996. Decided Feb. 12, 1996. Before: ALDISERT, * SCHROEDER, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Connie Hoang Shrewsbury appeals the district court's order denying her motion to amend her petition for naturalization in order to reflect her true birth date. In Shrewsbury's motion, she explained that she had taken the name and birth date of her older sister when she married in Vietnam. She further explained this was done for the purpose of permitting the marriage and thereby enabling her to come to the United States as the wife of an American citizen. Shrewsbury's petition for naturalization was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.