Lyla L. Thomas v. Allied Signal, Inc. Garrett Fluid Systems, Inc.

Good Law
77 F.3d 490·1996 WL 73382·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 8873
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 20, 199695-15240California795 words

Opinion

Opinion

77 F.3d 490 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lyla L. THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALLIED SIGNAL, INC.; Garrett Fluid Systems, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15240. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 7, 1996. * Decided Feb. 20, 1996. Before: BROWNING, PREGERSON, and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lyla L. Thomas appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment for defendants in her action alleging retaliation and discrimination in violation of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 623 (a); and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 & 1983. Thomas also appeals the district court's denial of her motion to appoint counsel. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. A. Merits 3 Thomas contends that the district court erred by granting defendants' motion for summary judgment on her claims of age, sex, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.