United States v. Gregory S. Brebner

Good Law
77 F.3d 490·1996 WL 65266·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 8897
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 14, 199695-30139California2,954 words

Opinion

Opinion

77 F.3d 490 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregory S. BREBNER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-30139. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 7, 1996. Decided Feb. 14, 1996. Before: WRIGHT, HALL, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 After the district court denied Gregory Brebner's motions to dismiss, he entered a conditional guilty plea to two counts of possession and six counts of distribution of cocaine, all in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). On appeal, Brebner argues that the district court erred: (1) in denying his motion to dismiss based on outrageous government conduct; and (2) in not conducting an in camera review of certain documents he claims were required to be disclosed under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). We affirm. I. 3 In what came to be known as operation "doughboy," the FBI and the Spokane Regional Drug Task Force joined together to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.