James Schreiber, Dba Schreiber's Leisure Leasing v. Plum Creek Timber Company Incorporated, Delaware Corporation Eric N. Haller

Good Law
77 F.3d 490·1996 WL 1833·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 8904
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 2, 199693-35563California2,884 words

Opinion

Opinion

77 F.3d 490 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James SCHREIBER, dba; Schreiber's Leisure Leasing, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PLUM CREEK TIMBER COMPANY INCORPORATED, Delaware Corporation; Eric N. Haller, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35563. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 8, 1995. Decided Jan. 2, 1996. Before: HALL, O'SCANNLAIN, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 This is a diversity case in which James Schreiber (Schreiber), an independent logger, sued Plum Creek Timber Company (Plum Creek) and Eric Haller (Haller), one of Plum Creek's employees in Oregon Circuit Court. The defendants removed the case to the district court for the District of Oregon. Schreiber alleged fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of contract. Schreiber subsequently abandoned his claim of negligent misrepresentation, and the district court granted summary judgment on the fraud and contract claims in favor of the defendants.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.