Jack R. Thomas v. Allied-Signal, Inc. Gary Freburger

77 F.3d 490 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jack R. THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALLIED-SIGNAL, INC.; Gary Freburger, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15264. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 7, 1996. * Decided Feb. 20, 1996. Before: BROWNING, PREGERSON, and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jack R. Thomas appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants in his employment discrimination action. Thomas also appeals the district court's denial of a number of motions. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 * Merits 4 We review the grant of summary judgment de novo. Jesinger v. Nevada Fed. Credit Union, 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir.1994). 5 "Incidents of discrimination not included in an EEOC charge may not be considered by a federal court unless the new claims are 'like or reasonably related to the allegations contained in the EEOC charge.' " Green v. Los Angeles County…