United States v. Patrick David Buker, Indicted as Patrick D. Buker

77 F.3d 490 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrick David BUKER, indicted as Patrick D. Buker, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-30056. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 12, 1996. Decided Feb. 20, 1996. Before: NOONAN, LEAVY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Patrick David Buker ("Buker") appeals from his conviction for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). He argues that the district court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence and his discovery motion. The district court held that the discovery of evidence resulted from a valid Terry stop and search pursuant to a lawful arrest. It also held that Buker had validly consented to the search of his truck. Buker challenges the denial of his motion for discovery of personnel and investigative files relating to Detective Claar who testified that Buker had consented…