United States v. Jeffrey Howard Van Poyck

77 F.3d 491 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey Howard VAN POYCK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50318. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 13, 1995. Decided Feb. 20, 1996. 1 Before: HALL and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and SHUBB * , District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Jeffrey Howard Van Poyck appeals his convictions of conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 371 , and armed bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a)(2). Specifically, he appeals the district court's denial of his motions: (1) to dismiss for violation of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 ; (2) to compel discovery of transcripts of recorded telephone conversations he claims were required to be disclosed under the Jencks Act ( 18 U.S.C. § 3500 ), Brady v. Maryland, and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(a)(1)(A); (3) to suppress statements made in violation of the Sixth Amendment; and (4) to exclude the use of…