United States v. Ramiro Ramirez-Gonzalez

77 F.3d 491 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramiro RAMIREZ-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-10277. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 7, 1996. * Decided Feb. 12, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ramiro Ramirez-Gonzalez appeals his sentence imposed following his guilty plea to conspiracy to manufacture, distribute and possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), 846. Ramirez-Gonzalez contends that the district court violated Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(3)(D) (now 32(c)(1)) by failing to make findings at the time of sentencing regarding his challenges to the Presentence Report ("PSR"). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo United States v. Hanoum, 33 F.3d 1128, 1133 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 1702 (1995), and affirm. 3 Federal Rule of…