Gabor v. Frazer
Opinion
Opinion
78 F.3d 459 34 Fed.R.Serv.3d 832 John GABOR and Kay Gabor, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Michael S. FRAZER; Santa Clara Valley Humane Society; State Board of Equalization; Steve Gibbons; American Kennel Club, Inc., aka AKC; Franchise Tax Board; Fred Berkey; John Cornelius; Cynthia K. Wright; Paul R. Firling, AKC; Maxine Patton; Andrea San Phillipo; Rita Perko; Rick Lamps, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-17133. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 7, 1996. John and Kay Gabor, Campbell, California, in pro se for the plaintiffs-appellants. Dennis B. Kavanagh, Law Offices of Alton M. Chambliss, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee, Andrea San Phillipo. Jeffrey R. Kurtock, Lewis, D'Amato, Brisbois & Bisgaard, San Francisco, California, for defendants-appellees, American Kennel Club and Paul Firling. Philip A. Torre, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee, Rita Perko. Stephen D. Pahl, Pahl & Gosselin, San Jose, California, for defendant-appellee, Maxine Patton. Paul D. Gifford, Deputy Attorney General, Oakland, California, for defendants-appellees, California State Board of Equalization, California Franchise Tax Board, Fred Berkey, John Cornelius…