Gabor v. Frazer

Good Law
78 F.3d 459·96 Daily Journal DAR 2629·34 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 832·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 3913·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1583
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 7, 199694-17133California442 words

Opinion

Opinion

78 F.3d 459 34 Fed.R.Serv.3d 832 John GABOR and Kay Gabor, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Michael S. FRAZER; Santa Clara Valley Humane Society; State Board of Equalization; Steve Gibbons; American Kennel Club, Inc., aka AKC; Franchise Tax Board; Fred Berkey; John Cornelius; Cynthia K. Wright; Paul R. Firling, AKC; Maxine Patton; Andrea San Phillipo; Rita Perko; Rick Lamps, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-17133. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 7, 1996. John and Kay Gabor, Campbell, California, in pro se for the plaintiffs-appellants. Dennis B. Kavanagh, Law Offices of Alton M. Chambliss, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee, Andrea San Phillipo. Jeffrey R. Kurtock, Lewis, D'Amato, Brisbois & Bisgaard, San Francisco, California, for defendants-appellees, American Kennel Club and Paul Firling. Philip A. Torre, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee, Rita Perko. Stephen D. Pahl, Pahl & Gosselin, San Jose, California, for defendant-appellee, Maxine Patton. Paul D. Gifford, Deputy Attorney General, Oakland, California, for defendants-appellees, California State Board of Equalization, California Franchise Tax Board, Fred Berkey, John Cornelius…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.