Mendoza

Mendoza v. McKnight

Good Law
9 F. App'x 606
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 8, 2001No. 99-35091California292 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

William Mark McKnight (“McKnight”) appeals the district court judgment in favor of Delegario Lemos-Mendoza (“Mendoza”) on a legal malpractice action.

On May 22, 1996, Mendoza filed a malpractice action against McKnight. On December 18,1996, McKnight filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition. Upon learning of the bankruptcy filing, the district court dismissed the malpractice case pursuant to the automatic stay provisions set forth in 11 U.S.C. § 362 (a).

In March 1997, Mendoza informed the district court that no record of a bankruptcy petition filed by McKnight existed. In light of this information, the district court re-opened the malpractice action, and entered judgment against McKnight on December 18,1998.

Mendoza’s information to the court was erroneous. In fact, McKnight’s bankruptcy was pending, and terminated in April 1997, with a discharge of all pre-petition debts.

Because McKnight’s bankruptcy was pending, re-opening the malpractice action violated the automatic stay provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. See In re Pettit, 217 F.3d 1072 , 1077 (9th Cir.2000); see also In re Dunbar, 245 F.3d 1058 , 2001 WL 322158 at *4 (9th Cir. April 4, 2001). Entry of judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.