Khalil Adil M. Al-Furqan v. State of California

78 F.3d 591 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Khalil Adil M. AL-FURQAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-15422. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 27, 1996. * Decided March 4, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, CANBY and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Khalil Adil M. Al-Furqan appeals the district court's Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that his constitutional rights were violated when the California Department of Motor Vehicles refused to renew his driver's license after the Alameda County Municipal Court unconstitutionally upheld the traffic citations issued by an Oakland police officer. 3 We affirm the district court's conclusions that Al-Furqan's claims against the police officer were barred under California's one year statute of limitations and his remaining claims, which Al-Furqan failed to amend, do not allege with at least some degree of…