Anderson v. City of Pasadena

Good Law
78 F.3d 591·1996 WL 109394·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 10345
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 12, 199694-56301California3,309 words

Opinion

Opinion

78 F.3d 591 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles ANDERSON; Mary Lean Anderson; Leola Beard; and Caroline Bowen, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF PASADENA; Pasadena Police Department; Jerry Oliver, Chief of Police; and Sherman T. Block, Sheriff, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-56301. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 7, 1996. * Decided March 12, 1996. 1 Before: PREGERSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and EZRA, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 This is a civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . Plaintiffs alleged in United States District Court that Pasadena Police Department (PPD) and Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (LASD) law enforcement officers executed a multiple-location residential search warrant that resulted in violations of their federal civil rights. The district court first granted the plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint and then…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.