Babb v. Gipe
Opinion
Opinion
78 F.3d 591 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Raymond F. BABB; Cristina F. Babb, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Howard GIPE, an Individual; Sharron Stratton, an Individual; Bill Hedstrom, an Individual; Idella Smithers, County Treasurer, and Individual; Susan Haverfield, an Individual; Tom Esch, an Individual; Jonathan B. Smith, an Individual; June Dvorak; Kathleen O'Rourke-Mullins; Flathead County; John & Jane Does, 1 through 10, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35745. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 27, 1996. * Decided March 5, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, CANBY and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Raymond and Cristina Babb appeal pro se the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim of their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Flathead County (Montana) officials challenging the assessment and collection of local property taxes. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We agree…