Ramon Salcido Bojorquez v. R. Prentice A. Vanpelt, Dr. E. Juel, Dr. R. Williams Guillory

78 F.3d 591 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ramon Salcido BOJORQUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R. Prentice; A. Vanpelt, Dr.; E. Juel, Dr.; R. Williams; Guillory, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16097. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 27, 1996. * Decided March 4, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Ramon Salcido Bojorquez appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990), and affirm. 3 Bojorquez contends the district court erred when it concluded that as a matter of law defendants were not deliberately indifferent to his pain and serious medical needs (a) from May 27, 1994, the date he first informed prison…