Evans v. Herman

Good Law
78 F.3d 592·1996 WL 83876·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 13607
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 27, 199695-16000California181 words

Opinion

78 F.3d 592 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frank EVANS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jerry HERMAN, District Attorney; Gregory Jones, Deputy District Attorney; Suzanne Duerden, Deputy District Attorney; Officer Providenza; Officer Jerrigan; City of Fairfax; Deidre Rand; and Lori Dennis, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16000. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 16, 1996. * Decided Feb. 27, 1996. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Attorney fees are awarded to defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (b). We do not award damages. * The panel unanimously find this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a) and Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4 ** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3