Daniel Costa v. Campagnie Generale Maritime Et Financiere Balandra Schiffahrts-Gesellschaft Mbh & Co., Kg

78 F.3d 592 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Daniel COSTA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CAMPAGNIE GENERALE MARITIME ET FINANCIERE; Balandra Schiffahrts-Gesellschaft MBH & Co., KG, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55726. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 5, 1996. Decided Feb. 27, 1996. Before: BEEZER, BRUNETTI and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Daniel Costa, an injured longshoreman, appeals a grant of summary judgment for defendant vessel owner, Balandra Schiffahrts-Gesellschaft MBH & Co., KG ("Balandra"). Costa alleges that Balandra negligently turned over an unreasonably safe vessel for loading and is therefore liable pursuant to the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950 , for injuries Costa sustained working on the vessel. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, and we reverse. 3 * On July 25, 1992, Costa was injured as he worked as…