Josefa Dolores Castro De Mendoza Angel Martin Mendoza-Sandoval v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
78 F.3d 592·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 13614
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 5, 199695-70200California396 words

Opinion

Opinion

78 F.3d 592 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Josefa Dolores CASTRO de MENDOZA; Angel Martin Mendoza-Sandoval, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 95-70200. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 27, 1996. * Decided March 5, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Josefa Dolores Castro de Mendoza and Angel Martin Mendoza-Sandoval ("the Mendozas"), both natives and citizens of Nicaragua, petition for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") dismissing their appeal of the Immigration Judge's ("IJ") denial of their requests for asylum and withholding of deportation under sections 208(a) and 243(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158 (a), 1253(h). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a) and deny the petition for review. 3 The Mendozas contend that the BIA's decision is not supported by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.