Dillman v. Contra Costa County

78 F.3d 592 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Patrick Arthur DILLMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, Linda Peterson, Michael Brown, Bruce Blackman, Shawn McMahon, Francine Carley, Susan Burton, District Attorney's Office, Barbara Stone, Barbara Yazhari, Carol Walsh, Amina Nassardeen, Lily Choi, Eileen Nemetz, Patricia McDonald, L. Katz, B. Stirling, The Public Defenders Office, Alternate Defender Office, Gary T. Yancey, Linda Solow, Dennis Noland, Family Stress Center, Born Free Program, Drug and Alcohol Prevention Program--East County Boys and Girls Club, Christopher K. King, Palmer, Juanita Quesada, Eleanor Norton, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15501. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 27, 1996. * Decided March 4, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Patrick Arthur Dillman appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action as…