Henry Earl Duncan v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Arthur Calderon, Warden, Real Party in Interest

78 F.3d 592 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Henry Earl DUNCAN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent, Arthur Calderon, Warden, Real Party in Interest. No. 96-70024. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 27, 1996. * Decided Feb. 29, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, BEEZER and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 Petitioner Henry Earl Duncan seeks a writ of mandamus directing the district court to enter a protective order in Duncan's federal habeas challenge to his conviction and death sentence. Pursuant to our request, the California Attorney General, representing Real Party in Interest Warden Calderon (hereafter "the State"), has filed a letter brief. On January 17, 1995, we stayed the district court's order compelling the production of documents. 2 We exercise jurisdiction under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651 , and we DENY the petition. 3 * Duncan was convicted of first…