Leathem v. U.S. Dist. Court, Eastern Dist. of California

Good Law
78 F.3d 593·1996 WL 95251·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 13624
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 5, 199695-16114California334 words

Opinion

Opinion

78 F.3d 593 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Marquita Denise LEATHEM; Robert Leathem; Sharon A. Martin; Clifford Murphy; Betty June Smith, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA; Garland E. Burrell, U.S. District Court Judge, in his official capacity and personal individual capacity; Edward J. Garcia, U.S. District Court Judge, in his official capacity and personal individual capacity; Lawrence K. Karlton, U.S. District Judge, in his official capacity and personal individual capacity; David F. Levi, U.S. District Court Judge, in his official capacity and personal capacity; Milton L. Schwartz, U.S. District Court Judge, in his official capacity and personal individual capacity; William B. Shubb, in his official capacity and personal individual capacity; Jack L. Wagner, Clerk of Court, in his official capacity and personal individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16114. United States Court of Appeals,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.