La Jolla Realty Advisors & Coldwell Bank v. Williams

Good Law
9 F. App'x 668
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 2001No. 99-56882; BAP No. SC-99-1022-PRyMaCalifornia336 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

We affirm the bankruptcy court’s grant of summary judgment to the debtors for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”). Paragraph G of the letter of intent between the debtors and Starwood Capital Group, LLC (“Starwood”) satisfied California’s Statute of Frauds. Under California law, when the only writing evidencing a commission is contained in a sale agreement between the seller and buyer, to which the broker is not a party, the commission is contingent upon the completion of that particular sale. Lawrence Block Co. v. Palston, 123 Cal.App.2d 300, 306 , 266 P.2d 856 (1954).

In some instances, a broker may be able to recover even when the specific sale *669 is not consummated, if the seller is the sole cause of the loss of the sale. See Collins v. Vickter Manor, Inc., 47 Cal.2d 875, 881 , 306 P.2d 783 (1957); Coulter v. Howard, 203 Cal. 17, 23-25 , 262 P. 751 (1927). In this case, the sale to Starwood was expressly contingent on an overbid process and bankruptcy court approval. Even though the debtors ultimately settled with another buyer, the brokers cannot bear their burden of proving the sale to Starwood would have closed but…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.