Gabor v. Frazer

78 F.3d 593 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John GABOR and Kay Gabor, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Michael S. FRAZER; Santa Clara Valley Humane Society; State Board of Equalization; Steve Gibbons; American Kennel Club, Inc., aka AKC; Franchise Tax Board; Fred Berkey; John Cornelius; Cynthia K. Wright; Paul R. Firling, AKC; Maxine Patton; Andrea San Phillipo; Rita Perko; Rick Lamps, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-17133. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 13, 1996. * Decided March 7, 1996. Before: REINHARDT, THOMPSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John and Kay Gabor (Gabors) appeal the district court's dismissal of their complaint with prejudice. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 1 FACTS 3 The present dispute arises out of the Gabors' sale of puppies from their home. On July 31, 1990, Michael S. Frazer, an employee of the Santa Clara Valley Humane Society (Humane Society), executed a…