Michael N. Hale v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs Todd Pacific Shipyards Corporation Aetna Casualty and Surety Company

Good Law
78 F.3d 593·1996 WL 95238·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 13627
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 5, 199695-70471California227 words

Opinion

Opinion

78 F.3d 593 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael N. HALE, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS; Todd Pacific Shipyards Corporation; Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Respondents. No. 95-70471. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 27, 1996. * Decided March 5, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael N. Hale petitions for review pro se of a decision of the Benefits Review Board issued on March 27, 1995. Hale filed his petition for review in this court on June 5, 1995, more than sixty days after the issuance of the Benefits Review Board's decision. See 33 U.S.C. § 921 (c). 3 Accordingly, we dismiss Hale's untimely petition for lack of jurisdiction. See Felt v. Director, OWCP, 11 F.3d 951, 952 (9th Cir.1993) (order dismissing untimely petition for review for lack of jurisdiction). 4 DISMISSED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.