Anthony Paul Hunter v. George H. Baldwin David C. Cassel Karen Johnson Oregon Department of Corrections

78 F.3d 593 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Anthony Paul HUNTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George H. BALDWIN; David C. Cassel; Karen Johnson; Oregon Department of Corrections, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35330. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 27, 1996. * Decided March 5, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Anthony Paul Hunter, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging infringement of his free exercise of religion and a denial of his due process rights. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. McGuckin v. Smith, 974 F.2d 1050, 1059 (9th Cir.1992). 4 Prison officials received a copy of an Identity Christian pamphlet entitled "Your Heritage" through first-class mail addressed to Hunter. The pamphlet argued that Aryans…