Armik Markarian v. Robert G. Borg, Warden C.A. Moore
Opinion
Opinion
78 F.3d 593 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Armik MARKARIAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert G. BORG, Warden; C.A. Moore, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16835. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 27, 1996. * Decided March 4, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Armik Markarian, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendant prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Markarian contends that the defendants' refusal to transfer him to another prison facility violated the Eighth Amendment because Markarian subsequently suffered injuries in a physical altercation with another inmate. Markarian also requested the district court to issue an order granting him access to the prison law library and an injunction preventing prison officials from transferring him to another prison. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We…