Keller v. Fresno City College, State Center Community College Dist.

Good Law
78 F.3d 593·1996 WL 83858·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 13629
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 27, 199694-16745California1,598 words

Opinion

Opinion

78 F.3d 593 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert KELLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FRESNO CITY COLLEGE, State Center Community College District; State Center Community College District Board of Trustees; Arthur Ellish; Bill F. Stewart; Brice W. Harris and Henry M. Fadden, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16745. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 16, 1995. Decided Feb. 27, 1996. 1 Before: GOODWIN and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges, and FITZGERALD, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Plaintiff appeals from the denial of his application for a preliminary injunction. Keller established a primae facia case of discrimination (based on drug-dependency treatment he received), and seeks reinstatement as Director of the Police Academy at Fresno City College. We affirm the interlocutory order. 4 The district court's findings of fact were not clearly erroneous, nor did the court abuse its discretion. The court's language may have conflated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.