Kim Hussein v. Raban Supply Co.

78 F.3d 593 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kim HUSSEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RABAN SUPPLY CO., Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-15914. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 27, 1996. * Decided March 4, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Kim Hussein appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of Raban Janitorial & Paper Supply Company ("Raban") dismissing her Title VII claim. Hussein alleges that she was terminated by Raban because of her race, national origin, and religion. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 We review the grant of summary judgment de novo. Wallis v. J.R. Simplot Co., 26 F.3d 885, 888 (9th Cir.1994). ANALYSIS I. Race and National Origin Discrimination 4 To successfully make out a Title VII employment discrimination claim, the plaintiff must first establish a prima facie case of discrimination. Wallis, 26 F.3d at 889 . If the…