Daniel M. Hundson Renee Hundson v. Action Building Systems, Francisco Reyes, and Does I-V

78 F.3d 593 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Daniel M. HUNDSON; Renee Hundson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ACTION BUILDING SYSTEMS, Francisco Reyes, and does I-V Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16008. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 17, 1995. Decided March 8, 1996. 1 Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and BAIRD. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Daniel and Renee Hundson appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment to appellees Action Building Systems and Francisco Reyes. The district court granted summary judgment on the ground that appellant Daniel Hundson ("Hundson") is a person in the same employ as appellees for purposes of the Nevada Industrial Insurance Act ("NIIA"), Nevada Revised Statutes 616.010 et seq. 4 The district court determined that the Department of Justice was Daniel Hundson's statutory employer and that the General Services Administration ("GSA") was the statutory employer of appellees…