Laszlo Szucs v. L & D Scaffolding, Inc., a California Corporation J.H. Fitzmaurice, Inc. J.H. Fitzmaurice, inc./r.m. Fitzmaurice Joint Venture

78 F.3d 594 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Laszlo SZUCS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. L & D SCAFFOLDING, INC., a California corporation; J.H. Fitzmaurice, Inc.; J.H. Fitzmaurice, Inc./R.M. Fitzmaurice Joint Venture, Defendants-Appellants. No. 94-17222. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 14, 1996 * Decided Feb. 23, 1996. Before: ALARCON, LEAVY, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 J.H. Fitzmaurice, Inc. ("Fitzmaurice") and L & D Scaffolding, Inc. ("L & D") appeal from the judgment entered following a jury verdict in favor of Laszlo Szucs in his personal injury action against Fitzmaurice and L & D. Fitzmaurice and L & D contend that: (1) the jury's finding of negligence is not supported by substantial evidence; (2) the amount of damages is excessive; and (3) the district court erred by excluding the defense of unclean hands. We affirm the judgment of the district court because neither the record nor the…