Sabil M. Mujahid v. Carol Hashimoto

78 F.3d 594 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sabil M. MUJAHID, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carol HASHIMOTO, et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-17379. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 8, 1995. * Decided March 1, 1996. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Hawaii state prisoner Sabil M. Mujahid appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that his constitutional rights were violated when prison officials held a classification hearing and decided that Mujahid was to remain in maximum security custody. We review de novo. Hutchinson v. United States, 838 F.2d 390, 393 (9th Cir.1988). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Mujahid contends that the district court erred in granting summary judgment for the defendants because his due process rights were violated when (1) he was denied notice of an…