United States v. Jack Jarvis Bryan

78 F.3d 595 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jack Jarvis BRYAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-15840. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 16, 1996. * Decided Feb. 28, 1996. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jack Jarvis Bryan appeals the district court's denial of his motion for bond-time credit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3568 . 1 He argues that the restrictions placed upon him while on bond were so oppressive as to constitute time in custody and thus, that this time should be credited toward service of his sentence. Because Bryan's motion challenges the execution of his sentence, the district court properly construed it as a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 . 2 See United States v. Giddings, 740 F.2d 770, 771-72 (9th Cir.1984). 3 The proper respondent in a § 2241 petition is the prisoner's warden.…