United States v. Raymond James Hoslett

78 F.3d 595 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond James HOSLETT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-56511. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 11, 1996. * Decided Feb. 23, 1996. Before: CHOY, SNEED, and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Raymond James Hoslett appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Hoslett argues that: (1) he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to counsel due to an actual conflict of interest which adversely affected his trial counsel's performance, (2) the district court failed to make an adequate inquiry into the matter, and (3) the district court erred by denying his § 2255 motion without conducting an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. Factual and Procedural Background 3 On August 21, 1991, Hoslett appeared for trial on three counts of unarmed bank robbery and one count of attempted bank robbery. Seated at the defense table…