United States v. Jack Jarvis Bryan

78 F.3d 595 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jack Jarvis BRYAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-15236. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 16, 1996. Decided Feb. 28, 1996. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Federal prisoner Jack Jarvis Bryan appeals the district court's denial of his motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. He argues that he was denied his right to due process because the sentencing court did not hold a full evidentiary hearing to address his objections to his presentence report ("PSR") or make separate findings of fact on each of his objections to his PSR. He further alleges that his right to due process was violated because the government did not abide by its plea bargain agreement with him. Finally, he asserts that he was denied effective assistance of counsel in…