Yosemite Insurance Company, a California Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. The Home Insurance Company, a New Hampshire Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant, and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance, Company, a Minnesota Corporation, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee. Yosemite Insurance Company, a California Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Cross-Appellant v. The Home Insurance Company, a New Hampshire Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Cross-Claimant, and St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, a Minnesota Corporation, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Cross-Appellee
Opinion
Opinion
78 F.3d 596 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. YOSEMITE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. The HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Hampshire corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant, and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance, Company, a Minnesota corporation, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee. YOSEMITE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Cross-Appellant, v. The HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Hampshire corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Cross-Claimant, and St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, a Minnesota corporation, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Cross-Appellee, Nos. 94-55000, 94-55001. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 18, 1995. Decided March 1, 1996. 1 Before: HUG and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and MUECKE, District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 The Home Insurance Company ("Home") contends in its direct appeal that the…