Yosemite Insurance Company, a California Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. The Home Insurance Company, a New Hampshire Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant, and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance, Company, a Minnesota Corporation, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee. Yosemite Insurance Company, a California Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Cross-Appellant v. The Home Insurance Company, a New Hampshire Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Cross-Claimant, and St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, a Minnesota Corporation, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Cross-Appellee

Good Law
78 F.3d 596·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 13751
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 1, 199694-55000California829 words

Opinion

Opinion

78 F.3d 596 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. YOSEMITE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. The HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Hampshire corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant, and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance, Company, a Minnesota corporation, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee. YOSEMITE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Cross-Appellant, v. The HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Hampshire corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Cross-Claimant, and St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, a Minnesota corporation, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Cross-Appellee, Nos. 94-55000, 94-55001. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 18, 1995. Decided March 1, 1996. 1 Before: HUG and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and MUECKE, District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 The Home Insurance Company ("Home") contends in its direct appeal that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.