Wallace Ward v. John Dobre, Warden United States Attorney General

78 F.3d 596 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Wallace WARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John DOBRE, Warden; United States Attorney General, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16460. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 27, 1996. * Decided March 4, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Wallace Ward, a former federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of the United States Attorney General, and summary judgment in favor of a former prison official, in his action brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Ward alleged that his First Amendment rights were violated when he was sanctioned for running a business from prison. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm in part, and vacate and remand in part. 3 * United States Attorney General 4 Ward contends that the district court erred by dismissing the United…