United States v. Kevin Pollard, Aka: David Brensen

78 F.3d 596 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin POLLARD, aka: David Brensen, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50636. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 5, 1996. * Decided Feb. 23, 1996. Before: POOLE, WIGGINS, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Kevin Pollard appeals his 78-month sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines following a guilty plea to bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). Pollard contends that the district court erred by enhancing his offense level three levels pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(2)(E) for possession of a dangerous weapon during the bank robbery. He also contends that the district court erred by sentencing him to the high end of the applicable guidelines range. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 The legality of a Guidelines sentence is reviewed de novo. United States v. Pomazi, 851 F.2d 244, 247…