Ruben Valenzuela-Grijalva v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

78 F.3d 596 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ruben VALENZUELA-GRIJALVA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 95-70356. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 27, 1996. * Decided March 5, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ruben Valenzuela-Grijalva, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") summary dismissal of his appeal from an Immigration Judge's ("IJ") order finding Valenzuela-Grijalva deportable as charged under sections 241(a)(1)(B) and 241(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. §§ 1251 (a)(1)(B) & 1251(a)(2)(B)(i). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a), and we deny this petition. I. SUMMARY DISMISSAL 3 Valenzuela-Grijalva contends that the BIA erred by summarily dismissing his appeal because the BIA's reference to 8 C.F.R. § 3.1…