Ramon Yacap Yadao, Dencio Yacap Yadao, Arturo Yacap Yadao v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

78 F.3d 596 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ramon Yacap YADAO, Dencio Yacap Yadao, Arturo Yacap Yadao, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70150. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Feb. 26, 1996. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ramon, Dencio and Arturo Yadao ("Yadao brothers") seek review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing their appeal of an Immigration Judge's ("IJ") finding that they were deportable pursuant to sections 212(a)(19) and (20) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act ("INA"). 8 U.S.C. §§ 1182 (a)(19) and (20). 1 The Yadao brothers argue on appeal that the deportation proceeding before the IJ was invalid because the IJ primarily relied upon evidence that was obtained unlawfully and thus, that the INS failed to meet its burden of proving deportability by clear and convincing evidence. See Laipenieks v.…