Wideman v. MacDonald
Opinion
Opinion
78 F.3d 596 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lonnell WIDEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Peter MacDONALD, Administrator; John Robledo, Captain; Frank Calma, Lieutanent; John Smythe, Administrator; Guy Alcosiba, Sergeant; Dennis Kauka, Chairman; Barry Vickery, Chairperson; Mike Mindoro, Chairperson; Edwin Shimoda, Corrections Administrator, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16524. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 27, 1995. Decided March 5, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lonnell R. Wideman, a Hawaii state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of prison officials in Wideman's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that his due process rights were violated when: (1) he was confined in administrative segregation, transferred to another prison, and confined in prehearing detention without having been given the required 24-hours written notice stating the reasons…