Sanchez-Gomez

United States v. Sanchez-Gomez

Good Law
9 F. App'x 722
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 25, 2001No. 96-50236, 96-50269; D.C. Nos. CR-95-00503-CBM CR-95-00504-CBMCalifornia485 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

In these consolidated appeals, Dario Sanchez-Gomez appeals his guilty plea convictions and concurrent 77-month sentences imposed for transporting illegal aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (a)(l)(A)(ii), and illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . Sanchez-Gomez’s attorney has filed a brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Sanchez-Gomez has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Counsel identifies the potential issue of whether the district court abused its discretion by failing to recognize its authority to downwardly depart on the basis of the minor nature of Sanchez-Gomez’s prior aggravated felony. We lack jurisdiction to review this discretionary decision not to depart because the district court indicated it found no special circumstances warranting a departure and did not state that it lacked the authority to depart on this basis. See United States v. Pinto, 48 F.3d 384, 389 (9th Cir.1995) (“[DJecisions to deny downward departure will be considered discretionary unless the district court indicates that its refusal to depart…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.