Rainsong Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Good Law
78 F.3d 1435·96 Daily Journal DAR 3198·26 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20832·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4697·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1871
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 19, 199693-71035California3,217 words

Opinion

Opinion

Goodwin, J.

Rainsong Company, following denial of its petition for rehearing by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (the Commission), seeks review of an order rejecting Rainsong’s application for a hydropower license on a stream within the Olympic National Forest.

I.

FACTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE HISTORY

Rainsong’s efforts to build a hydroelectric power plant (the project) began in 1981. Rainsong applied for a license from the Commission pursuant to the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C. §§ 791a et seq. The license application proposed building the project on Lena Creek.

The first application was denied by order of the Director of the Commission’s Office of Hydropower Licensing on June 29, 1987. The denial was based on the conclusion of the Secretary of Agriculture, relying on the Forest Service’s staff reports, that the project would interfere and be inconsistent with the purpose of the Olympic National Forest.

Rainsong appealed that order, and the Commission granted its appeal on January 25, 1990. The order reinstated Rainsong’s application and gave Rainsong six months to try to resolve the Forest Service’s objections and to amend the license application if needed. Rainsong filed an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.