Bland v. Fessler

Good Law
79 F.3d 942·96 Daily Journal DAR 3726·24 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1592·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 6059·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2224
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 1, 199695-55522California4,645 words

Opinion

Opinion

79 F.3d 942 64 USLW 2625 , 24 Media L. Rep. 1592 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2224 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3726 William BLAND and National Association Of Telecomputer Operators, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Daniel William FESSLER; P. Gregory Conlon; Norman D. Shumway; Jessie J. Knight Jr.; and Patricia M. Eckart, in their individual and official capacities as Public Utilities Commissioners; Daniel E. Lungren, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55522. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 17, 1995. Decided April 1, 1996. Rex S. Heinke, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Los Angeles, California, for plaintiffs-appellants. Ronald A. Reiter, Deputy Attorney General, Los Angeles, California, and Mark Fogelman, California Public Utilities Commission, San Francisco, California, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Edward Rafeedie, District Judge, Presiding. Before: FLETCHER, CANBY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: 1 Plaintiffs appeal the grant of summary judgment dismissing their action against the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.