Garcia-Munoz

Garcia-Munoz v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Good Law
10 F. App'x 455
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 26, 2001No. 99-70916; INS Nos. A70-930-513 A70-930-514California361 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Mateo Garcia-Munoz and Ramona Arreola-Miranda, husband and wife, petition for review of the final order of deportation entered by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) on June 30, 1999. Petitioners were served with an order to show cause (“OSC”) on January 23, 1995 (Miranda) and March 31, 1995 (Munoz), approximately six years after they entered *456 the United States on September 22, 1989. At a hearing on January 8,1997, the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denied Petitioners’ applications for suspension of deportation because they had failed to meet the continuous physical presence requirement before being served with the OSC and thus were statutorily ineligible for suspension. On appeal, the BIA affirmed.

Petitioners contend that they were eligible for suspension of deportation and challenge the BIA’s decision that the “stop-time rule”—a new continuous physical presence requirement set forth in the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (“IIRIRA”)— bars such relief in their case. Moreover, Petitioners contend that the IJ erroneously applied the stop-time rule to their case on January 8, 1997, before IIRIRA’s effective date of April 1, 1997.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.