Leon

Leon v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Good Law
10 F. App'x 459
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 26, 2001No. 99-71001; INS No. A70-956-167California268 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Graciela Leon, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of a final decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing her appeal of an immigration judge’s denial of her application for suspension of deportation. Pursuant to the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (“IIRIRA”), the transitional rules apply, see Kalaw v. INS, 133 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir.1997), and we therefore have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a), as amended by IIRIRA § 309(c), see Avetova-Elisseva v. INS, 213 F.3d 1192 , 1195 n. 4 (9th Cir.2000). We deny the petition for review.

Leon contends that the “stop-time rule”—a new continuous physical presence requirement set forth in IIRIRA— cannot be applied to her because she is in deportation proceedings and the new rule applies only to applicants in removal proceedings. This contention is without merit. See Ram v. INS, 243 F.3d 510, 513, 515 (9th Ci2001).

Leon’s contention that the stop-time rule violates equal protection is also without merit. See id. at 517 .

We do not consider petitioner’s eligibility, if any, for relief under the class action pending in the district court in accordance…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.