Reynaga-Fregozo

United States v. Reynaga-Fregozo

Good Law
10 F. App'x 525
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 25, 2001No. 99-50682; D.C. No. CR-98-01273-AHMCalifornia216 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Francisco Reynaga-Fregozo appeals the 77-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation. Reynaga-Fregozo contends that in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), his *526 sentence must be vacated because it exceeds the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a) based upon a prior felony to which he did not admit and which was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury. Reynaga-Fregozo also contends that Apprendi renders inapplicable Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998) (holding that 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b)(2) is a sentencing factor and not a separate offense), because he did not admit that his removal from the United States was subsequent to his conviction of an aggravated felony. His arguments are foreclosed by this court’s recent decision in United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), amended (Feb. 8, 2001) (order). United States v. Castillo-Rivera, 244 F.3d 1020, 1024-05 (9th Cir.2001).

AFFIRMED.

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.