Coleman

Coleman v. Pacific Gas and Electric Co.

Good Law
79 F.3d 1152
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 19961152California1,098 words

Opinion

Opinion

79 F.3d 1152 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John COLEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY; International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1245, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-17217. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 12, 1996. * Decided March 18, 1996. Before: CHOY, BEEZER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment for Pacific Gas & Electric Co. ("PG & E") and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1245 ("Local 1245" or "Local"). We affirm. 3 Appellant, a member of Local 1245, was discharged from his job at PG & E in December 1992 after PG & E concluded that appellant had connected his hot tub to an unmetered PG & E line without authorization. 1 After appellant filed a grievance with Local 1245 alleging termination without just cause, the Local Investigating Committee of Local 1245 ("LIC")…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.