Carlos Jose Cisneros Maria Asuncion Cisneros Hjolmar Cisneros, AKA Hjalmar Cisneres v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
79 F.3d 1152·1996 WL 119667·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17160
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 199695-70402California822 words

Opinion

Opinion

79 F.3d 1152 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Carlos Jose CISNEROS; Maria Asuncion Cisneros; Hjolmar Cisneros, aka Hjalmar Cisneres, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 95-70402. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 12, 1996. * Decided March 18, 1996. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Carlos Jose Cisneros, his wife, Maria Asuncion Cisneros, and his son, Hjolmar Cisneros (the "Cisneroses") are natives and citizens of Nicaragua. The Cisneroses petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") denial of their motion to reopen proceedings for consideration of an application for suspension of deportation under 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). We review for an abuse of discretion, Aviles-Torres v. INS, 790 F.2d 1433, 1435 (9th Cir.1986), and deny the petition. 3 The Cisneroses contend that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.